Drawing for PURE SPARKLING FLAVOR

USPTO serial 85555546

PURE SPARKLING FLAVOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURE SPARKLING FLAVOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Flavoring for beverages contained in drinking strawsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 6, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2013WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2013WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance