Drawing for WHAMMY

USPTO serial 85555619

WHAMMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAPTER, ALAIN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHAMMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Weinberg

STEVEN M. WEINBERG HOLMES WEINBERG, PC30765 PACIFIC COAST HWY STE 411MALIBU, CA 90265-3646UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Target games, board games and card games, playing cards, kites, toy action figures, balls of all kinds, dolls, doll playsets, plush toys, toy vehicles, toy cars, toy trucks, toy bucket and shovel sets, roller skates, toy model hobbycraft kits, toy rockets, toy guns, toy holsters, musical toys, jigsaw puzzles, badminton sets, bubble making wands and solution sets, molded plastic toy figurines, toy banks, puppets, toy balloons, yo-yos, skateboards, toy scooters, toy and novelty face masks, stand alone video game machines, LCD game machines, hand held unit for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor, but specifically excluding dice games and computer software, all of the foregoing relating to televised entertainmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 4, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 6, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 29, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 24, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 6, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 6, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 12, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 15, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance