USPTO serial 85556953
CALABASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALABASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth R. Schaefer
KENNETH R. SCHAEFER KENNETH R. SCHAEFER, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW104 BAY POINT HARBOURPOINT PLEASANT BORO, NJ 08742-5511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | African and African Style food products used in preparation of African Style Cuisine, namely, Smoked, Dried, Seasoned, Canned and Fresh Turkey, Chicken, Beef, Lamb, Corned Beef, Luncheon Meat and Meat Sausage; Edible Oils and Shortenings, namely, Red Palm Oil, Zomi Palm Oil, Palm Nut Concentrates, Banga Soup, Canola Oil, Coconut Oil, Carotene Oil, Sunflower, Peanut, Sesame and Vegetable Oil, Vegetable Ghee and Butter Ghee; Dried, Processed and Prepared Fruits and Vegetables, Canned and Frozen Cassava Leaves, Jute Leaves, Palava Minced, Okra, Garden Egg and Eggplant, Beans, Legumes, Peas and Lentils, Black Eyed Peas, Brown Lentils, Red Lentils, White Lentils, Kidney Beans, Lima Beans, Egusi Seeds, Nigerian Honey Beans, and Green Peas; Flour Blend products, namely, Plantain Flour, Cocoyam Flour, Yam Flour, Yuca Flour, Cassava Flour, Fufu Flour,Yam Flour, Millet Flour, Banku Mix Flour, Banku Mate Flour, Hausa Koko Flour, Kokonte Cassava Flour, Pounded Yam Flour, Bean Flour and Potato Flour; Beef Stock, Chicken Stock, Fish Stock, Vegetable Stock and Shrimp Stock in Cubes, Powder and Liquid Form; Processed Bitter Leaves, Processed Ukazi; Potato products, namely, Mashed Potato, Instant Potatoes, Potato Flakes, Potato Granules for use in Prepared Meals or Food; Soups, namely, Beef, Chicken and Shrimp; Evaporated Milk, Condensed Milk, Concentrated Milk and Powdered Milk; Peanut Butter, Coconut Cream, Prepared and Processed Nuts, Cassava Chips, Plantain Chips; Chocolate MilkShakes; African pickled vegetables in the nature of Gari, Ground Egusi | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed Cereals and Grains, Buttered Cookies, Oat Flakes, Processed Oats, Grits, Corn Starch Based Drink in the Nature of a Food Beverage consisting primarily Maize and Porridge, Custard, Tapioca, Tomato Sauce, Mayonnaise, Dijon Mustard Sauce, Chocolate Malt for Food Purposes, Chocolate Powder, Malt Extracts for Food Purposes; Coffee; Tea; Cassava Starch, Potato Flour; Potato Food Starch, Barley Flour, Processed Semolina, Spices; Rice, Namely, Jasmine, Thai, Long Grain, Scented, Basmati, Parboiled and Brown Rice; Pasta, Vermicelli and Instant Noodles; Buckwheat Flour; Wheat Germ for Human Consumption; Processed Bran; Processed Cereals, namely, Attieke Cassava, Couscous, Barley, Buckwheat, Millet and Bulgor Wheat; Shito Pepper Sauce, Curry Powder, Allspice, Thyme Seasoning, Mustard, Ogbono Powder | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |