USPTO serial 85557231
BOBBY MAO'S GREAT CHINESE FOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOBBY MAO'S GREAT CHINESE FOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Palm Springs, CA
Palm Springs, CA
Miromar Lakes, FL
Miromar Lakes, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roman Whittaker, Esq.
Roman Whittaker, Esq. Anderholt Whittaker LLP73525 El Paseo, Suite E2516Palm Desert, CA 92260UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Granatt, Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Granatt, Tina
- Other trademarks owned by Granatt, Robert
- Other trademarks owned by Granatt, Tina
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named BOBBY MAO'S GREAT CHINESE FOOD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 29, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |