Drawing for BLACKJACK EXCHANGE

USPTO serial 85557667

BLACKJACK EXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLACKJACK EXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ira David

Ira David Law Offices of Ira David7375 S. Pecos Rd.Suite 101Las Vegas, NV 89120

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, casino gaming; Gambling services; Gaming services in the nature of casino gamingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 9, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance