Drawing for EL PANDILLO

USPTO serial 85557759

EL PANDILLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL PANDILLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers and barware, namely, beverageware, serving ware for serving food, beverage trays, spice shakers, beverage stirrers, beverage shakers, portable beverage coolers, ice buckets, drink pourers, namely, pouring spouts for household, bar and restaurant use, bowls, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, glass jars for storing tips, serving trays not of precious metal; candle holders not of precious metal, bottles sold empty; and menu holders in the nature of menu display standsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, tops, bottoms, jackets, coats, dresses, sleepwear, undergarments, swimwear, scarves, ties, headwear and footwearACTIVE—
033TequilaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 1, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 1, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 30, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 21, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 17, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance