USPTO serial 85557782
GELLY.TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GELLY.TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jersey City, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica D. Klein
ERICA D. KLEIN KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP1177 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-2714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Software to enable streaming, uploading, posting, playing, editing, sharing, searching, annotating, manipulating, reproducing and otherwise providing video content and electronic information via a global computer network, wireless network, mobile digital electronic device or other electronic or digital communications network or digital communications device; downloadable players for video content; downloadable video content in the fields of television, movies, entertainment, politics, news, current events, comedy and sports; broadcasting and streaming of video content via a global computer network, wireless network, mobile digital electronic device or other electronic or digital communications network or digital communications device; video broadcasting services, namely, uploading, streaming, posting, playing, editing, sharing, searching, manipulating, and electronically transmitting video, audio and audio-visual media content; providing online electronic bulletin boards, blogs and forums for transmission of messages; video-on-demand transmission and webcasting services; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring videos, content, user-generated media content, movies, images, text, photographs, electronic media and related information and commentary; online digital video publishing services; hosting of video content on the internet or other global computer network; hosting and maintaining a website featuring video and related information and commentary; providing programmatic interfaces for third parties to access website content and data; providing a platform for the aggregation of video content via a global computer network, wireless network, mobile digital electronic device or other electronic or digital communications network or digital communications device; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software to enable uploading, posting, annotating, editing, playing, streaming, sharing, manipulating, searching, publishing, reproducing, and otherwise providing videos, user-generated media content, movies, images, text, photographs, electronic media and related information and commentary via a global computer network, wireless network, mobile digital electronic device or other electronic or digital communications network or digital communications device | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |