USPTO serial 85559258
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David R. Stevens
DAVID R STEVENS STEVENS LAW GROUP1754 TECHNOLOGY DRIVESUITE 226SAN JOSE, CA 95110-1319| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Polyethylene film with a rubber resin adhesive used to protect surfaces in the nature of stone, metal, stainless steel sinks, backsplashes, countertops, and shower stalls for use in the construction industry | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |