USPTO serial 85559925
OPTIXFAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTIXFAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacture of LED lighting products including light bulbs, lamps, luminaires, downlights, outdoor lighting fixtures, LED modules, and LCD backlighting modules; Custom manufacture of optical components including diffusers, wavelength conversion components, beam shaping components, lenses, light guides and other components designed to redirect or otherwise manage light; custom manufacture of composite materials used in optical, thermal, or electrical applications | ABANDONED | May 29, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |