USPTO serial 85562055
STEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, JANET H
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc E. Hankin
MARC E. HANKIN HANKIN PATENT LAW, APC11414 THURSTON CIRLOS ANGELES, CA 90049-2435UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communications computers; Communications servers; Computer chassis; Computer cursor control devices, namely, computer mouse; Computer cursor control devices, namely, touch pads; Computer cursor control devices, namely, trackballs; Computer hardware and computer peripheral devices; Computer joysticks; Computer keyboard controllers; Computer keyboards; Computer keypads; Computer mice; Computer monitor frames; Computer monitors; Computer mouse; Computer mouse in the nature of a trackpad; Computer mouse, namely, touchpads; Computer mouse, namely, trackballs; Computer peripheral devices; Computer peripheral equipment; Computer screens; Computer servers; Computer storage devices, namely, blank flash drives; Computer touchscreens; Computers; Computers and computer hardware; Computers and computer peripherals; Computers for use in data management; Computers, namely, netbooks; Electronic computerized credit card imprinters; Electronic LCD display unit with multi-networking (TCP/IP) capabilities; Integrated computerized system for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information related to chemical analyses; Laptop computers; Mounting devices for cameras and monitors; Mounting devices for monitors; Mounting racks for computer hardware; Notebook and laptop computers; Notebook computers; Wireless computer mice; Wireless computer peripherals | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1991 |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring Computer hardware, rack and rack-mounted computers, panel mounted computers, miniature computers, small form factor computers, rugged computers, industrial computers, embedded computers, harsh environment computers, water proof computers, portable computers, notebook computers, tablet computers, desktop computers, server computers, keyboards, trackball pointing devices, mouse pointing devices, liquid crystal display units, disc drives, monitors, digital storage devices, fan-less computers, marine computers, and computer accessories | ACTIVE | Dec 7, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |