USPTO serial 85563439
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian A. Hall
Brian A. Hall Traverse Legal PLC810 Cottageview Drive, Unit G-20Traverse City, MI 49684UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, makeup, sun screen preparations, nail care preparations, hair care preparations, non-medicated skin care preparations, soap powders, bath oils and powders, and baby oils and powders, colognes, perfumes, perfume oils, aftershaves | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |