Drawing for VGT

USPTO serial 85564080

VGT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VGT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tiffany L. Schwartz

Tiffany L. Schwartz Armstrong Teasdale LLP7700 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1800St. Louis, MO 63105-1847UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE FOR GAMING MACHINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT GENERATES OR DISPLAYS OUTCOMES FOR GAMING MACHINES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND FIRMWARE FOR GAMING MACHINES ON A COMPUTERIZED PLATFORMACTIVE—
028GAMING MACHINES, NAMELY, GAMES OF CHANCE, GAMES WHICH ACCEPT A WAGER, SLOT MACHINES, VIDEO GAMING MACHINES AND BINGO RELATED GAMES; VIDEO BASED SLOT MACHINES, REEL BASED SLOT MACHINES, GAMING MACHINES IN THE NATURE OF VIDEO LOTTERY TERMINALSACTIVE—
037INSTALLATION SERVICES, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF GAMING MACHINESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, LEASING, FOR CONSUMER PLAY, OF GAMING MACHINES THAT GENERATE OR DISPLAY WAGER OUTCOMES AND GAMING SOFTWARE THAT GENERATES OR DISPLAYS WAGER OUTCOMESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2026ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 22, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 8, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 3, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 11, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2012MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 14, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance