USPTO serial 85565234
TWEETZILLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWEETZILLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
BAYVILLE, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
JACKSON, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RENE-MARTIN OLIVERAS
18 BROOKLAKE RDFLORHAM PARK, NJ 07932-2817UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Removing birds from residential and commercial buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, JEANNE
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, JEANNE
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, PAUL
- Other trademarks owned by ROSARIO, PAUL
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THERESA
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THERESA
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THOMAS
- Other trademarks owned by KAPS, THOMAS
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named TWEETZILLA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |