USPTO serial 85566134
SOLID CULTURE RELEVANT REWARDS TEAM LEADER SHARP INSIGHTS COMMON MEASURES CLEAR DIRECTION EFFICIENT PRACTICES DEFINED ROLES TEAM LEADER CONSISTENT COMMUNICATION SOLID CULTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLID CULTURE RELEVANT REWARDS TEAM LEADER SHARP INSIGHTS COMMON MEASURES CLEAR DIRECTION EFFICIENT PRACTICES DEFINED ROLES TEAM LEADER CONSISTENT COMMUNICATION SOLID CULTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James D. Rosenblatt
JAMES D. ROSENBLATT THE ROSENBLATT LAW FIRM, P.C.16719 HUEBNER RD BLDG 1SAN ANTONIO, TX 78248-2344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advice in the field of business management and marketing; Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Assistance and advice regarding business organization and management; Assistance with business management and planning; Business advice and analysis of markets; Business consultancy; Business consultation; Business consultation and management regarding marketing activities and launching of new products; Business consultation services; Business consultation services, namely, business process improvement and enterprise architecture design | PARTIALLY PAID | Jan 10, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ArchPoint, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SOLID CULTURE RELEVANT REWARDS TEAM LEADER SHARP INSIGHTS COMMON MEASURES CLEAR DIRECTION EFFICIENT PRACTICES DEFINED ROLES TEAM LEADER CONSISTENT COMMUNICATION SOLID CULTURE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |