Drawing for MAXIMUM IMPACT

USPTO serial 85566920

MAXIMUM IMPACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXIMUM IMPACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers

MATTHEW H SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVENUE WESTSUITE 151VIENNA, VA 22180

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Martial arts uniforms; Martial arts uniforms, namely, gis; Mixed martial arts suitsACTIVE—
028Martial arts training equipment; Martial arts training equipment, namely, nunchucks; Sports equipment for boxing and martial arts, namely, boxing gloves, boxing bags, punching mitts, belly protectors, groin protectors and shin guards; Sports equipment for boxing and martial arts, namely, boxing gloves, mixed martial arts gloves, punching mitts, and shin guards; Sports equipment for boxing, martial arts, and the like, namely, an apparatus to support a moving heavy bag; Sports equipment for boxing, martial arts, and the like, namely, protective bras; Training apparatus for boxing, martial arts, and similar sportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2013TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 22, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 22, 2013OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 24, 2013OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 26, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance