USPTO serial 85568023
NIMOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIMOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Berger
KIMBERLY A. BERGER MILLER CANFIELD150 W JEFFERSON STE 2500DETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | dish washing machines, clothes washing machines, clothes dryers, dry-cleaning machines, vacuum cleaning machines, and dust catching machines; machine parts, namely, plastic molds, die-casting molds and cold punching molds for use in the manufacture of household appliances and construction materials, namely, construction formwork and construction and decoration board consisting of PVC board, PVC foam board and plastic board | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | construction services, namely, providing building construction information, rental of construction equipment, scaffold building construction services, construction management in the nature of project progress examination, warehouse construction and repair, construction of underwater structures, interior building cleaning, and construction of docks and/or waterbreaks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | architectural consulting, engineering services, and computer software design; research and testing of materials, namely, polypropylene and fiberglass; industrial product design, namely, packaging, mold and structural design for building templates or construction formwork | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Echom North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Echom North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NIMOVA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |