USPTO serial 85568319
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Dieppe, New Brunswick, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
ANDREW S. EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Reforestation services, namely, forestry management and forestry management consulting services; providing a website offering information about forest management, namely, the role of well managed forests; promoting the sale of wares and services of others through promotional contests; coupon programs pertaining to a line of absorbent consumer paper products in the nature of providing incentive award programs for customers through the issuance and processing of loyalty coupons for frequent use of participating businesses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | conducting contests to win educational funds and educational resources; conducting contests pertaining to a line of absorbent consumer paper products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |