USPTO serial 85568904
THE ALTERNATIVE TO GALVANIZING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 7, 2014
- Examiner
- MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ALTERNATIVE TO GALVANIZING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L. King III
William L. King III KING & PARTNERS, PLC170 COLLEGE AVE STE 230HOLLAND, MI 49423-2982UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS, NAMELY, CORROSION INHIBITORS FOR USE ON METALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 14, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Jan 4, 2023 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | โ |
| Jan 4, 2023 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | โ |
| Dec 12, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | โ |
| Apr 3, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 3, 2021 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | โ |
| May 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Apr 8, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 8, 2020 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | โ |
| Oct 6, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jul 7, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 7, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | โ |
| Jan 7, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Dec 3, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 1, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Dec 1, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Oct 22, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 21, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Sep 7, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Aug 19, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jan 31, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Jan 10, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jan 7, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jun 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Mar 22, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |
| Mar 17, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |