Drawing for SCROLLS

USPTO serial 85568981

SCROLLS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCROLLS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ann K. Ford

ANN K FORD DLA PIPER LLP500 8TH STREET NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2131UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025articles of clothing for men, women and children, namely, tops, bottoms, jackets, jerseys, shirts, shorts, sweatshirts, polo shirts, pullovers, trousers, coats; footwear, namely, socks, stockings; headwear, namely, hats, caps and sun visors; knitwear, namely, knit tops and knit bottoms, scarves, gloves, and underwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 2, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 2, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 17, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 1, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 8, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 8, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 8, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance