Drawing for Serial No. 85571775

USPTO serial 85571775

Serial No. 85571775

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85571775?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Goldschmidt, Jr.

JOHN W GOLDSCHMIDT JR FERENCE & ASSOCIATES LLC409 BROAD STREETPITTSBURGH, PA 15143UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS, TRAINING, AND COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTH, MEDICAL CARE, VISION, SPORTS AND FITNESS, NUTRITION, ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS, COMPUTERS AND INTERNET, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INVENTION, MUSIC, AND READING, AND DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITHACTIVESep 14, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 19, 2016EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Jul 18, 2016PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2016RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
May 18, 2016CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 16, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2015CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 13, 2015CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 15, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 15, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 14, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 14, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 14, 2014CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Feb 6, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 19, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 20, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 20, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 20, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 16, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2012MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 26, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance