USPTO serial 85572578
KEMACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4493296Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2014
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KEMACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Baking items, namely, regular flour, high gluten flour, whole wheat flour, graham pie crust, chocolate pie crust, real chocolate chips, processed sesame seeds, processed poppy seeds, matzo, matzo meal, whole wheat and bran matzo, whole wheat matzo meal, spelt matzo, spelt matzo meal, chow mein noodles, fine chow mein noodles, wide chow mein noodles, noodles, pasta, fine noodles, medium noodles, broad noodles, egg barley, toasted barley, small corn flakes, small oat flakes, small wheat flakes, large corn flakes, large oat flakes, large wheat flakes, large egg bow pasta, small egg bow pasta, old fashioned toasted barley, lasagna, spaghetti, elbow macaroni, couscous, elbow pasta, ziti, penne pasta, rigati spiral pasta, cookies, sandwich cookie, assorted sandwich cookie, vanilla sandwich cookie, chocolate chip cookie made in a nut free facility, sugar cookie made in a nut free facility, oatmeal cookie made in a nut free facility, chocolate chip cookie made in a nut free facility, soft chocolate chip cookies, soft chocolate-chocolate chip cookies, soft oatmeal raisin cookies, old fashion oats, quick oats, ready to eat oat bran cereal, cream farina, oatmeal sugar crackers, crackers, unsalted crackers, cinnamon graham crackers, honey graham crackers, salted saltines crackers, unsalted saltines crackers, sesame breadsticks, garlic breadsticks, whole wheat breadsticks, whole wheat everything flat bread, whole wheat sesame flat bread, pizza flat bread, garlic flat bread, cinnamon and sugar flat bread, everything flat bread, sesame flat bread, ready to eat cereals, ready to eat wheat flake cereal, ready to eat bran flake cereal, ready to eat frosted wheat flake cereal, ready-to-eat raisin bran cereal, ready-to-eat corn flake cereal, ready-to-eat toasted oat cereal, ready-to-eat honey and nut oat cereal, ready-to-eat cocoa crisp rice cereal, ready-to-eat sugar puffed wheat cereal, ready-to-eat fruit whirl corn crisp cereal, ready-to-eat honey crunch corn cereal, ready-to-eat honey crunch wheat cereal, ready to eat honey crunch oat cereal, salt plain, iodized salt, matzo ball mix, ice cream cones, vanilla cup cones, color cup cones, sugar cones, chocolate syrup, fruity ice bars, color-free cherry flavored ice, color-free raspberry flavored ice, marshmallow cream | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 20, 1960 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2013 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2013 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |