Drawing for M MAN LIFT MFG CO

USPTO serial 85573239

M MAN LIFT MFG CO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M MAN LIFT MFG CO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan D. Slattery

ALAN D SLATTERY REMBOLT LUDTKE LLP1201 LINCOLN MALLSUITE 102LINCOLN, NE 68508-2888

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, mobile hydraulic lift consisting of aerial work platforms and material handling machinesACTIVEFeb 1, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 9, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 9, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 25, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 12, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 12, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 17, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 17, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 2012MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance