USPTO serial 85573597
GCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irving Keschner
21535 HAWTHORNE BLVDSTE 385TORRANCE, CA 90503-6651Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio amplifiers; Audio equipment for vehicles, namely, loud speakers for automotive audio systems; Audio equipment for vehicles, namely, stereos, speakers, amplifiers, equalizers, crossovers and speaker housings; Audio equipment for vehicles, namely, subwoofers; Car navigation computers; CD players; Cell phones; Computers; Digital audio and video recorders and players; Digital cameras; Digital video recorders; DVD players; DVD recorders; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; GPS navigation device; Navigation apparatus for vehicles; Navigation apparatus for vehicles in the nature of on-board computers; Navigational instruments for vehicles; Radio receivers; Satellite receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |