USPTO serial 85575344
BLAC-STAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4359932Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 2, 2013
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLAC-STAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
LEWISTON, ME
Other trademarks owned by PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL
PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
LEWISTON, ME
Other trademarks owned by PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
LEWISTON, ME
Other trademarks owned by PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul M. Raya
Paul M. Raya Cook Alex Ltd.200 W. Adams St.Ste. 2004Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | conductive low density polyethylene plastic bags for electronic uses, namely, as industrial and commercial packaging | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | conductive polyethylene in the form of films used as an industrial or commercial packing; laminates co-extrusions, namely, extruded plastic in the form of sheets for use in manufacturing; plastic in extruded form for general industrial use; packing foam in sheet form | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSCENDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PURESTAT ENGINEERED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TRANSCENDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named BLAC-STAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 2, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 17, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |