Drawing for RINSTREAM

USPTO serial 85577009

RINSTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RINSTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard L. West

RICHARD L. WEST Skystream Markets, Inc.6 LANDMARK SQ STE 400STAMFORD, CT 06901-2711UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Conducting on-line auctions for renewable identification numbers; conducting services related to on-line auctions for renewable identification numbers, namely, providing market information, arranging of trading transactions, and publishing of price quotations, all on a centralized platformACTIVE—
036Brokerage in the field of voice and electronic trading of renewable identification numbersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 9, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 19, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 19, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 10, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 10, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 10, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2012RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Jun 27, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 29, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance