USPTO serial 85577089
CASEPICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4385666Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 13, 2013
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CASEPICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WILMINGTON, MA
WILMINGTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. LaBrie
MICHAEL J. LABRIE MCAFEE & TAFT211 N ROBINSON AVE FL 10OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102-7176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Machinery and equipment for use in automated materials handling and storage systems, namely, automated digital controls for commercial handling and storage systems; computer software for controlling automated materials handling and storage systems and computer hardware and computer peripherals for use in automated materials handling systems, namely, computer hardware, software, and peripherals for use in the guidance of transfer vehicles for use in the field of automated materials handling and computer hardware, software and peripherals for use in the control of automated materials picking; and electric and electronic instruments and apparatus for use in automated materials handling systems, namely, control cabinets specifically adapted for housing automated materials handling and storage equipment in the nature of controller hardware, software, and programmable logic controllers; Radio frequency controls, namely, RFID tags and readers; Infrared controls, namely, bar code scanners and infrared optical data couplers; Laser scanners, voice actuated controls for commercial handling and storage systems, sensors for sensing speed, location, dimensions and weight, electric switches for electric motors, electrical wires and cables, capacitors, power supplies, and emergency power supplies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 2010 |
| 012 | Automated transport vehicles in the nature of automatic guided vehicles for use in automated materials handling and storage systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 8, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 13, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 5, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |