Drawing for PUREFILL

USPTO serial 85578231

PUREFILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4522497Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 29, 2014
Examiner
DEFORD, JEFFREY S
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUREFILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura M. Franco

LAURA M FRANCO WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 CALIFORNIA STREET39TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5894

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Artificial turf system comprising synthetic grass fibers attached to a backing material and infill materials associated therewithSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDApr 2, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Dec 16, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 29, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 22, 2014SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2014REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 14, 2014CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 14, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2013CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 24, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2013CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2013SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 29, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2013IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 8, 2013EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 28, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance