Drawing for GENIUS

USPTO serial 85579713

GENIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GENIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond Rundelli

Raymond Rundelli Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP1405 East Sixth StreetThe Calfee BuildingCleveland, OH 44114-1607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metal valve cartridges that are sold empty to high tech manufacturers, namely, cartridges for use with fluid jetting systems that dispense liquid or viscous adhesives, sealants, encapsulants, coatings and fluxes onto electronic products to bond, assemble or protect components of those productsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2013MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2013ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 11, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 8, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance