CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BAILEY & BELLA

USPTO serial 85579755

BAILEY & BELLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAILEY & BELLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott L.L.C.50 South 16th StreetTwo Liberty Place, 22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Pet collars and leadsACTIVE—
021Pet feeding dishesACTIVE—
028Pet toys made of rubber, latex or vinylACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 6, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 5, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 24, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 29, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 28, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2013INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Oct 23, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 23, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 1, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 23, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 2, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance