Drawing for TRACKING CAMERA

USPTO serial 85580043

TRACKING CAMERA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRACKING CAMERA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Volk Jr.

MICHAEL D VOLK JR3003 NW LOOP 410SUITE 100SAN ANTONIO, TX 78230-5132

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware for tracking objectsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 15, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 15, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 28, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 14, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 14, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 17, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 17, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 3, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 29, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance