USPTO serial 85581449
HOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
Los Angeles, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
Beverly Hills, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Nesset, Esq.
Deborah Nesset, Esq. Law Office of Deborah Nesset5509 E. Stageline DriveBoise, ID 83716UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motorcycle goggles; motorcycle helmets; protective clothing and gear, namely, articles of protective clothing for wear by motorcyclists for protection against accident or injury, bags specially adapted for protective helmets; protective helmets; sound recording apparatus and accessories, namely, covers specially adapted for such sound recording apparatus; musical sound recordings; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, magazines, newsletters, pamphlets, booklets and brochures in the field of motorcycles, art, photography, film, and the life of an actor; motion picture films in the field of motorcycles, art, photography, film, and the life of an actor; digital video discs in the field of motorcycles, art, photography, film, and the life of an actor; storage cases for CDs and DVDs | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Bags, namely, messenger bags, all-purpose sports bags, duffel bags, carry-all bags; wallets; luggage; backpacks; trunks and traveling bags; tote bags; carrying cases; leather goods included in this class, namely, leather key chains, leather pouches, leather cases; umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, T-shirts, denim shirts, jeans, denim jackets, leather jackets, ponchos; footwear, headwear; clothing, namely, motorcycle gloves, motorcycle jackets and motorcycle rain suits, footwear and headwear for use with motorcycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of The Hopper Art Trust
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named HOPPER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 25, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |