USPTO serial 85587086
PRESSLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4646774Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2014
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRESSLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Gilmore
RICHARD C. GILMORE Maschoff Brennan Laycock Gilmore Israelsen & Wrigh111 S. Main StreetSuite 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for automatically rendering online content, including text, photos and videos, into magazine-style, HTML5 templates for optimized display on tablet and smartphone web browsers, and for enabling users to customize a set of templates and then connect automated feeds of content into a publishing engine, and for reformatting the content into HTML5 templates and presenting the content in a way that leverages the interactive qualities of digital, touch screen tablets and smartphones, and for facilitating the display and tracking of full screen interstitial advertisements, in between articles, and for enabling social sharing of individual content pieces, such as articles, to major social networks and email | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 25, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |