Drawing for TEMO

USPTO serial 85587250

TEMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura J. Winston

LAURA J. WINSTON LAW OFFICE OF LAURA J. WINSTON52 MAIN STHASTINGS ON HUDSON, NY 10706-1602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Interior design services, namely, design of lighting for interiors; product research and development services for others; technical research and technical project studies in the field of solid state lighting; industrial analysis and research in the field of solid state lighting; new products design services; industrial design, namely, design of lighting installations for industrial use; design and technical planning of lighting installationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2013MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 14, 2013ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 13, 2013EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 4, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance