USPTO serial 85588111
APTIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APTIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary L. Shapiro
MARY L SHAPIRO MARY L SHAPIRO LAW PC244 CALIFORNIA STREETSUITE 507SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 4354Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used in, and for use in the design and development of, microprocessor cores and semiconductor intellectual property (SIP) cores; computer code products, namely, simulators for microprocessor cores and SIP cores; microprocessor cores and SIP cores; electronic publications in the nature of manuals, specifications, guides, and data sheets all in the field of computer technology in downloadable form or recorded on computer media | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |