USPTO serial 85589111
LEHIGH VALLEY BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 1, 2013
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LEHIGH VALLEY BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Harrisburg, PA
Harrisburg, PA
GATEHOUSE MEDIA PENNSYLVANIA HOLDINGS, INC.
PITTSFORD, NY
Other trademarks owned by GATEHOUSE MEDIA PENNSYLVANIA HOLDINGS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Falcon, III
JOSEPH R. FALCON, III BARLEY SNYDER101 LINDENWOOD DR STE 100MALVERN, PA 19355-1755UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promotional sponsorship of business-related events; Entertainment and educational admission venue control services, namely, the remote verification of ticket validity upon presentation of tickets at an entertainment venue; Arranging of subscriptions for the publications of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 7, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Journal Multimedia, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Journal Multimedia, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GATEHOUSE MEDIA PENNSYLVANIA HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LEHIGH VALLEY BUSINESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2013 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2013 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 4, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2013 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |