USPTO serial 85589923
PROTECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacqueline L. Patt
Jacqueline L. Patt Markery Law LLCP.O. Box 84150Gaithersburg, MD 20883-4150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software and downloadable computer software for identity theft and fraud protection | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Monitoring consumer credit reports and providing an alert as to any changes therein; credit card registration services; credit card cancellation services for lost or stolen cards; credit card monitoring services for lost or stolen cards; providing assistance in the prevention of unwanted telephone calls, namely, registration on "do not call" telephone lists; Providing consultation in the field of commercial mailing lists, namely, consultation relating to removal from such lists to prevent delivery of junk and unsolicited commercial mail | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing identity theft insurance underwritten by others; Providing credit reporting data maintained by others; credit management services, namely, assistance with restoring credit damaged by identity theft; fraud resolution assistance, namely, providing advice and consultation in the field of identity theft regarding credit restoration, credit card fraud reimbursement, and credit card replacement services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Identity theft protection and identity fraud protection services; Identity theft protection and identity fraud protection services, namely, personal information and financial identity monitoring; fraud resolution assistance, namely, providing advice and consultation in the field of Identity theft, namely, advice and consultation relating to filing of police reports; Identity theft and fraud protection services, namely, internet surveillance of financial and personal information; providing online information in the field of identity theft protection; providing a secure interactive website concerning notifications of potential fraud and potential identity theft; Fraud detection services in the nature of arranging secure authentication of personal data in requests to open banking, credit, credit card, insurance, loan, and other financial accounts; monitoring the Internet, public records, private and public electronic databases to facilitate the detection of identity theft and fraud; Identity theft protection services, namely, analyzing public and personal information and providing a report assessing risk of identity theft; Providing a web site featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of identity theft protection and identity fraud protection; monitoring consumer credit reports to facilitate the detection of identity theft and fraud; Providing alerts regarding inappropriate, dangerous or suspicious behaviors on mobile phones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intersections Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intersections Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named PROTECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |