Drawing for HOST

USPTO serial 85590656

HOST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vicky Bajwa

154 N 35th StreetSeattle, WA 98103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Cutters for wine bottle foilACTIVE—
021hand tools, namely, hand-operated pumps to preserve wine and liquor and bottle openersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 18, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 18, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2012WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2012WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 21, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 9, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance