Drawing for TELMAR CENTAB

USPTO serial 85591100

TELMAR CENTAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TELMAR CENTAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill C. Lesser

110 E 59TH ST 22ND FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for analyzing micro-geographical data, for use in advertising media planning; computer software for accessing a geographic mapping database, for use in the field of advertising media planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 30, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 30, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 14, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance