Drawing for DIGITALPREP

USPTO serial 85591438

DIGITALPREP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROMER, ZACHARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITALPREP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Garron M. Hobson

GARRON M HOBSON THORPE NORTH AND WESTERN LLPPO BOX 1219SUITE 350SANDY, UT 84091-1219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009dental software for automatically generating an electronic model of a cutting guide positionable on a patient's teeth and marking margins on the electronic model of a patients teethACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 9, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 9, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 25, 2014EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 13, 2014GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2014GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2014CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 14, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 11, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 29, 2013GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2013CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2013EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 30, 2013JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 2013EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 29, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 29, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 16, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance