USPTO serial 85591855
816 BOYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 816 BOYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
Kansas City, MO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of an on-going special variety, news, music or comedy show featuring indicate subject matter broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Queen, Manzilla M
- Other trademarks owned by Yates, Aaron Dontez
- Other trademarks owned by Calhoun Jr., Melvin
- Other trademarks owned by Watson, Samuel C
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named 816 BOYZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |