Drawing for STRATEGIC WEALTH DESIGNERS

USPTO serial 85592353

STRATEGIC WEALTH DESIGNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FARRELL, ANNE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRATEGIC WEALTH DESIGNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Samantha M. Quimby

SAMANTHA M QUIMBY FROST BROWN TODD LLC10 W BROAD STSTE 2300COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3484

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036investment brokerage, consultation, management, and advice; insurance brokerage and consultation; financial analysis, consultation, management, and planning; financial planning for retirementACTIVEJul 31, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2014MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 25, 2014ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 25, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 10, 2014EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 18, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 24, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 24, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 22, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 22, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 27, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance