Drawing for BLUE SEAL

USPTO serial 85593598

BLUE SEAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE SEAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Mitchell

JAMES A. MITCHELL MITCHELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PLLC1595 GALBRAITH AVE SEGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Conveyor lines, chain conveyors, chains for conveyors and fitted attachments and structural and replacement parts therefor; conveyor trolleys and fitted attachments and structural and replacement parts therefor, structural parts for conveyors, namely, conveyor rails being for supporting conveyor trolleys, conveyor channels being structural parts of conveyors for carrying chains for conveyorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 23, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 23, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 28, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2013XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2013GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2013GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2013CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 28, 2013GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 28, 2013GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2013CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 8, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2013TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance