USPTO serial 85593825
FUN 2GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUN 2GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly K. Reynolds
KELLY K. REYNOLDS HULTQUIST IPPO BOX 14329RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709-4329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and bath and beauty products, namely antibacterial wipes, namely, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; bath kits containing bubble bath and shampoo; body sprays; cotton pads for cosmetic purposes, gel eye masks, lotions, nail polish remover wipes, cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes, shower gels, soaps, blushes, eyeliners, eye shadows, false eyelashes, foundation creams, lip glosses, lipsticks, mascaras, sachets | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Nail files, foot files, manicure sets, nail clippers, tweezers, eyelash combs and brushes in the nature of eyelash separators | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, namely earrings, bracelets and charms | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Cosmetic bags sold empty; luggage and travel accessories, namely backpacks; foldable all-purpose carrying bags; jewelry rolls for travel; luggage belts in the nature of belt bags, luggage tags, shoe bags for travel, tote bags, and umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bath sponges; hair brushes, combs; makeup brushes; sponge massagers, toothbrush covers; sponges used for applying make-up, lint rollers; lotion bottles sold empty for domestic use; lotion bottles with stir sticks sold empty for domestic use; pill boxes for personal use; empty spray bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Shower caps, flip flops, shawls, sleep masks, travel slippers, travel socks; bra straps; headbands, fabric headbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bump Creative Partners Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FUN 2GO
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |