USPTO serial 85593937
FIT MATTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLIER, DAVID E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIT MATTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Portland, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Anna McCoy
JOHN D RUSSELL ALLEMAN HALL MCCOY RUSSELL & TUTTLE LLP806 SW BROADWAYSUITE 600PORTLAND, OR 97205-3335Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, namely, shoes, boots, sandals, and slippers; socks and booties; headgear, namely, hats, caps, visors, headbands, ear bands, ear muffs, and beanies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |