Drawing for TXFORMATIVE

USPTO serial 85594948

TXFORMATIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TXFORMATIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Joe Weston

MARY JOE WESTON SIMPLICITY LAW, INC.11852 SHAFFER DR STE DLITTLETON, CO 80127-3764UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software development tools; Computer software for application development, enhancing multimedia applications, database management, clustering and managing computer hardware distributed across multiple machines, use as a set that requires no external software as it can boot machines, connecting to all the hardware and drive all services directlyACTIVESep 12, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2013MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 17, 2013ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2012CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Sep 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Sep 26, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Sep 26, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 25, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 25, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 22, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 19, 2012MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Apr 18, 2012NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 16, 2012PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2012NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance