USPTO serial 85596977
UNO MOMENTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNO MOMENTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVE FL 23BOSTON, MA 02210-2206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for advertising and promoting the goods of others over the Internet; advertising and information distribution services, namely, providing advertising space via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computer software for video rendering; image and audio processing computer software for use in video rendering; computer software for use in manipulating visual imagery and visual special effects, and sounds and audio special effects for use in making motion pictures, films, video and audio productions; providing on-line video rendering services; computer services for creating and manipulating visual imagery and visual special effects, and sounds and audio special effects for use in making motion pictures, films, videos, and video and audio productions; computer services, namely, image and audio processing services for video rendering; computer software for creating an automated slideshow with visual special effects, music and text | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Mar 22, 2012 |
| 041 | computer software for video rendering; image and audio processing computer software for use in video rendering; computer software for use in manipulating visual imagery and visual special effects, and sounds and audio special effects for use in making motion pictures, films, video and audio productions; providing on-line video rendering services; computer services for creating and manipulating visual imagery and visual special effects, and sounds and audio special effects for use in making motion pictures, films, videos, and video and audio productions; computer services, namely, image and audio processing services for video rendering; computer software for advertising and promoting the goods of others over the Internet; advertising and information distribution services, namely, providing advertising space via a global computer network; computer software for creating an automated slideshow with visual special effects, music and text | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |