USPTO serial 85599837
MOREFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOREFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele P. Schwartz
MICHELE P. SCHWARTZ ANDREWS KURTH LLP1717 MAIN ST STE 3700DALLAS, TX 75201-4749UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |