USPTO serial 85600498
VERVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2020
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with VERVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Universal International Music B.V.
Baarn, NL
Other trademarks owned by Universal International Music B.V.
Universal International Music B.V.
Baarn, NL
Other trademarks owned by Universal International Music B.V.
Universal International Music B.V.
Hilversum, NL
Other trademarks owned by Universal International Music B.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent LaBarge
Brent LaBarge Universal Music Group2220 Colorado AvenueSanta Monica, CA 90404United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | production and publishing of music; providing online entertainment, namely, providing non-downloadable sound and video recordings in the field of music and music based entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing online non-downloadable prerecorded musical sound and video recordings via a global computer network; fan clubs; development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of music and entertainment; audio and sound recording and production; record production; production of motion picture films; distribution of motion picture films; publication of books and magazines; entertainment in the nature of ongoing radio programs in the field of music; entertainment in the nature of live concerts and performances by musical artists and groups; entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by musical groups, musical artists and celebrities; entertainment services in the nature of performances rendered by musical artists through the medium of television, radio, and non-downloadable audio and non-downloadable video recordings; entertainment services, namely, performances by musical artists rendered live and recorded for future distribution; educational and entertainment services, namely, production and presentation of music shows before live audiences which are all broadcast live or taped for later broadcast; entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring non-downloadable musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials featuring music and entertainment; entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of music, musical artists and music videos; entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded non-downloadable music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of music festivals; entertainment services, namely, conducting exhibitions in the field of music; organizing exhibitions for entertainment purposes featuring music; and publishing of web magazines | ACTIVE | Jan 20, 1956 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal International Music B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal International Music B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Universal International Music B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named VERVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 11, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 29, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |