USPTO serial 85601671
SPARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROMER, ZACHARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Murphy
John M. Murphy Arochi, Marroquín & Lindner, S.C.Building C1-56YI5802 Bob Bullock (Loop 20)Laredo, TX 78041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication by electronic computer terminals; communications by computer terminals; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; broadcasting of video and audio programming over the Internet; Communication services, namely, transmission of voice, audio, visual images and data by telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, the internet, information services networks and data networks; transmission and distribution of data or audio visual images via a global computer network or the internet; providing internet access; streaming of audio material on the internet; streaming of video material on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing workshops, seminars and courses for the training of teachers and for providing teaching skills; providing workshops, seminars and courses in the field of school management and administration; providing workshops, courses, seminars and classes in the fields of mastering the English language, developing competitiveness for life, learning to learn, and strengthening computer capabilities; Educational services, namely, developing educational models for others for teaching English to children in pre-school, elementary school, junior high and high school; Educational services, namely, providing learning programs and strategies for implementation; Educational services, namely, developing educational methods for others based on pedagogic principles; educational services, namely, offering of assessments and surveys in the field of educator training and performance for the purpose of improving teaching procedures; providing information and news in the field of teaching methodology and education issues; providing information and news in the field of teaching methodology and education; teaching at elementary schools; teaching at junior high schools; teaching at high schools; educational services, namely, professional coaching of teachers in the field of teaching methods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMCO INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SERVICES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AMCO INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SERVICES, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SPARK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |