USPTO serial 85604043
IPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Boland, Jr.
Robert W. Boland, Jr. BOLAND LAW GROUP14850 N SCOTTSDALE RD STE 350SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254-2884UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | (Based on Intent to Use) Luggage; sports bags; shoulder bags; beach bags; duffle bags; all-purpose sports bags; general purpose sports equipment bags; attaché cases; school bags; tote bags; knapsacks; rucksacks; wallets; umbrellas; waist packs; luggage tags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, pants, shorts, socks, shoes, jackets, sweatshirts, wrist bands, head bands, polo shirts, long sleeve shirts, skirts, dresses, socks, underwear, ponchos, rain jackets; sports clothing, namely, sports jerseys for use in a game similar to tennis in rules, played on a badminton sized court, using paddles or rackets to hit a plastic ball over a 34 inch net | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2012 |
| 028 | (Based on Intent to Use) Sports equipment, namely, rackets, paddles, sport balls, bags specially adapted for sports equipment and nets and bags specially adapted for sports equipment, for use in a game similar to tennis in rules, played on a badminton sized court using paddles or rackets to hit a plastic ball over a 34 inch net | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Association services, namely, promoting the interests of participants in, and promoters of, a game similar to tennis in rules, played on a badminton sized court using paddles or rackets to hit a plastic ball over a 34 inch net; marketing services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with various activities, tournaments and personalities relating to a game similar to tennis in rules, played on a badminton sized court using paddles or rackets to hit a plastic ball over a 34 inch net; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic networks or the internet; promoting goods and services of others by arranging for businesses to affiliate their goods and services with the goods and services of third party associations by means of sponsorship relationships relating to a game similar to tennis in rules, played on a badminton sized court using paddles or rackets to hit a plastic ball over a 34 inch net | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Sports Marketing LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Sports Marketing LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named IPA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |